However, traditional file servers still require recurring subscriptions for Windows File Server as well as licenses for each individual client, quickly increasing the total cost as your workforce grows. This could be due to security, compliance, or the risk of rearchitecting infrastructures to a full cloud deployment. In a survey by Computer Economics last year, companies with 75% or more of their software spending in the cloud were found to keep some applications on-premise. Storing data locally can provide better speed, reliability, and security than SaaS when accessing data through the corporate intranet. Traditional file servers aren’t much betterīusinesses that want to take total ownership of their data can choose to purchase their own hardware, pay for Windows File Server licenses, and buy separate Client Access Licenses to build a custom conventional file server. If it grows to 100 employees, it will be spending almost $15,000 per year just not to lose essential services.Ĭlearly, the public cloud can be financially unsustainable for businesses looking for a long-term-solution or needing to scale up. For a firm of 30 people, that equals about $13,000 in subscription fees over three years. Google Workspace (opens in new tab), among the most popular SaaS services, costs about $12 per user, per month for a Business Standard Plan, or about $144 per year. Recent surveys by Kentik, Densify, and Flexera found that cost management and over-spending are primary concerns for companies investing in cloud (opens in new tab) services. Subscription models on a per-account basis can become a significant burden as you begin to hire more people.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |